← Rejected pictures, redrawn

Does Muse draw better from the original photo than from the cut-out?

33 pieces: the 24 whose clean picture was rejected, plus a control of 9 whose picture is ready today (Eva, Ivona, Andraz; jeans, trousers, knitwear, shoes, a dress). A = cut-out only (today's request), B = original photo only, the prompt naming the garment ("the black trousers"), C = original photo first, then the cut-out labelled as the garment to draw. Each uses the same pressed prompt from CleanPrompt.ts, changed only in its first sentence for B and C. Every drawing was keyed and framed as production stores it, then judged with production's Clef compare twice: against the cut-out (production's gate) and against the whole original (no detection box is stored). A pass is min(same, faithful) ≥ 0.5. Production's face check (Clef judge, face ≥ 0.3) on every original skipped none (highest 0.02).

Most of these "originals" are not camera photos: these are v1 imports, so the original is v1's own picture (20 are product shots, 5 garments already cut out alone, 6 worn by a person, 2 snapshots on a bed).

A vs cut-outA vs originalB vs cut-outB vs originalC vs cut-outC vs original
rejected (24)11/24 46%12/24 50%10/24 42%12/24 50%12/24 50%17/24 71%
control (9)9/9 100%8/9 89%8/9 89%8/9 89%6/9 67%8/9 89%
By type
SetTypeA vs cut-outA vs originalB vs cut-outB vs originalC vs cut-outC vs original
controlboots1/1 100%0/1 0%1/1 100%1/1 100%0/1 0%0/1 0%
controldresses1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%
controljeans2/2 100%2/2 100%1/2 50%1/2 50%1/2 50%2/2 100%
controlknitwear2/2 100%2/2 100%2/2 100%2/2 100%2/2 100%2/2 100%
controltrainers1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%
controltrousers2/2 100%2/2 100%2/2 100%2/2 100%1/2 50%2/2 100%
rejectedbags1/2 50%1/2 50%1/2 50%1/2 50%1/2 50%2/2 100%
rejectedboots1/1 100%0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%1/1 100%
rejectedcoats1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%
rejectedjeans0/3 0%3/3 100%0/3 0%3/3 100%0/3 0%3/3 100%
rejectedknitwear0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%
rejectedloungewear0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%0/1 0%
rejectedoutdoorShoes1/2 50%0/2 0%2/2 100%1/2 50%1/2 50%1/2 50%
rejectedsandals2/2 100%2/2 100%1/2 50%1/2 50%2/2 100%2/2 100%
rejectedshortSleeveTops1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%
rejectedsleevelessTops2/4 50%1/4 25%3/4 75%1/4 25%4/4 100%2/4 50%
rejectedsportswear1/2 50%0/2 0%0/2 0%0/2 0%1/2 50%1/2 50%
rejectedswimwear1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%1/1 100%
rejectedtrousers0/3 0%2/3 67%0/3 0%2/3 67%0/3 0%2/3 67%

Scores below each drawing: same / faithful.

Ivona
bags
white
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.71 / 0.73 ✓
vs original: 0.69 / 0.74 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.66 / 0.71 ✓
vs original: 0.64 / 0.67 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.68 / 0.74 ✓
vs original: 0.67 / 0.70 ✓
Eva
bags
brown
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

All three turn the slouchy bag into a structured flap bag; C is the closest.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.24 / 0.27 ✗
vs original: 0.39 / 0.46 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.29 / 0.41 ✗
vs original: 0.46 / 0.53 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.47 / 0.50 ✗
vs original: 0.59 / 0.58 ✓
Eva
boots
black
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.53 / 0.54 ✓
vs original: 0.50 / 0.50 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.38 / 0.47 ✗
vs original: 0.47 / 0.53 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.38 / 0.39 ✗
vs original: 0.52 / 0.55 ✓
Ivona
coats
beige
rejected
original: garment alone, already cut out; face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.55 / 0.60 ✓
vs original: 0.56 / 0.61 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.68 / 0.82 ✓
vs original: 0.63 / 0.80 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.75 / 0.79 ✓
vs original: 0.65 / 0.78 ✓
Ivona
jeans
navy
rejected
original: worn by a person, with other things; face 0.01

All three are good jeans. They pass against the whole original and fail against the fragment cut-out: the cut-out is the problem.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.25 / 0.29 ✗
vs original: 0.69 / 0.67 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.21 / 0.26 ✗
vs original: 0.67 / 0.63 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.31 / 0.33 ✗
vs original: 0.73 / 0.76 ✓
Ivona
jeans
blue
rejected
original: worn by a person, with other things; face 0.01

Same: they pass against the original (0.70+) and fail against the cropped cut-out.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.25 / 0.21 ✗
vs original: 0.71 / 0.63 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.18 / 0.12 ✗
vs original: 0.70 / 0.59 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.17 / 0.15 ✗
vs original: 0.78 / 0.71 ✓
Ivona
jeans
blue
rejected
original: worn by a person, with other things; face 0.01

B and C, drawn from the worn photo, turn the grey-green vintage wash into ordinary blue; A keeps the wash.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.30 / 0.23 ✗
vs original: 0.81 / 0.79 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.16 / 0.09 ✗
vs original: 0.82 / 0.78 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.19 / 0.09 ✗
vs original: 0.78 / 0.72 ✓
Eva
knitwear
black
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

All three drop the lace-up ties, even from the original product shot. The input isn't the problem; the pressed wording is.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.40 / 0.30 ✗
vs original: 0.12 / 0.09 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.27 / 0.15 ✗
vs original: 0.11 / 0.10 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.24 / 0.15 ✗
vs original: 0.13 / 0.12 ✗
Eva
loungewear
white, yellow, purple
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.02

A and C drop the prints. B keeps the prints but draws a button-up shirt instead of the tee: the wrong garment.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.60 / 0.04 ✗
vs original: 0.41 / 0.04 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.49 / 0.49 ✗
vs original: 0.35 / 0.35 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.41 / 0.04 ✗
vs original: 0.54 / 0.05 ✗
Eva
outdoorShoes
beige
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.68 / 0.60 ✓
vs original: 0.63 / 0.47 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.69 / 0.56 ✓
vs original: 0.66 / 0.42 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.70 / 0.63 ✓
vs original: 0.67 / 0.57 ✓
Eva
outdoorShoes
grey
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

All three turn the side view into a head-on view, because the prompt says 'from the front'. Shoes need their own framing line.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.63 / 0.36 ✗
vs original: 0.64 / 0.48 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.77 / 0.58 ✓
vs original: 0.76 / 0.53 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.64 / 0.47 ✗
vs original: 0.61 / 0.36 ✗
Eva
sandals
green
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.66 / 0.63 ✓
vs original: 0.60 / 0.54 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.62 / 0.37 ✗
vs original: 0.65 / 0.40 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.61 / 0.62 ✓
vs original: 0.63 / 0.62 ✓
Eva
sandals
beige
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.65 / 0.66 ✓
vs original: 0.57 / 0.66 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.66 / 0.64 ✓
vs original: 0.74 / 0.68 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.69 / 0.57 ✓
vs original: 0.62 / 0.61 ✓
Eva
shortSleeveTops
white
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.66 / 0.89 ✓
vs original: 0.52 / 0.78 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.69 / 0.89 ✓
vs original: 0.61 / 0.83 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.71 / 0.89 ✓
vs original: 0.55 / 0.76 ✓
Eva
sleevelessTops
black
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Passes against the cut-out, but scores about 0.25 against an original that looks the same. Judge noise.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.77 / 0.76 ✓
vs original: 0.23 / 0.21 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.71 / 0.77 ✓
vs original: 0.26 / 0.24 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.66 / 0.77 ✓
vs original: 0.39 / 0.41 ✗
Eva
sleevelessTops
black
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

B and C keep the small chest logo that A dropped; both pass.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.56 / 0.38 ✗
vs original: 0.37 / 0.22 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.70 / 0.60 ✓
vs original: 0.33 / 0.20 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.68 / 0.82 ✓
vs original: 0.67 / 0.71 ✓
Eva
sleevelessTops
red
rejected
original: snapshot on a bed; face 0.01

C keeps the asymmetric hem best.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.62 / 0.60 ✓
vs original: 0.84 / 0.83 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.58 / 0.64 ✓
vs original: 0.91 / 0.88 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.59 / 0.54 ✓
vs original: 0.82 / 0.76 ✓
Eva
sleevelessTops
grey
rejected
original: snapshot on a bed; face 0.01

Muse refused A and B; C (photo plus cut-out) went through and is faithful.

Original
Cut-out
A
none
refused by Muse in the first run
B
none
refused by Muse (content filter)
C
vs cut-out: 0.69 / 0.71 ✓
vs original: 0.56 / 0.48 ✗
Eva
sportswear
orange
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

B loses the Y-back straps; A and C keep them.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.51 / 0.55 ✓
vs original: 0.38 / 0.38 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.50 / 0.51 ✗
vs original: 0.46 / 0.51 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.53 / 0.53 ✓
vs original: 0.51 / 0.51 ✓
Eva
sportswear
black
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

All three straighten the crossed straps. Same cause: 'straps fall straight and symmetrically'.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.12 / 0.09 ✗
vs original: 0.16 / 0.12 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.14 / 0.10 ✗
vs original: 0.16 / 0.12 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.18 / 0.15 ✗
vs original: 0.17 / 0.16 ✗
Eva
swimwear
red, blue, white
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.60 / 0.71 ✓
vs original: 0.71 / 0.74 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.63 / 0.70 ✓
vs original: 0.69 / 0.74 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.62 / 0.74 ✓
vs original: 0.73 / 0.77 ✓
Ivona
trousers
grey
rejected
original: worn by a person, with other things; face 0.01

B and C add the outfit's belt, which is not part of the trousers. B also leaves a magenta fringe.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.38 / 0.46 ✗
vs original: 0.86 / 0.84 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.48 / 0.25 ✗
vs original: 0.89 / 0.85 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.38 / 0.32 ✗
vs original: 0.90 / 0.91 ✓
Ivona
trousers
white
rejected
original: worn by a person, with other things; face 0.01

Same: about 0.85 against the original, about 0.4 against the torn cut-out.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.43 / 0.51 ✗
vs original: 0.87 / 0.86 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.37 / 0.34 ✗
vs original: 0.85 / 0.80 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.43 / 0.41 ✗
vs original: 0.82 / 0.79 ✓
Eva
trousers
black
rejected
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

All three are practically identical to the cut-out and to the original product shot, yet score 0.37 to 0.48. The judge is noisy on plain black.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.46 / 0.58 ✗
vs original: 0.38 / 0.41 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.45 / 0.52 ✗
vs original: 0.38 / 0.44 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.48 / 0.59 ✗
vs original: 0.37 / 0.40 ✗
Eva
boots
black
control
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

All three are good. A and C fail against the product-shot original and C against the cut-out too: judge noise.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.78 / 0.63 ✓
vs original: 0.63 / 0.18 ✗
B
vs cut-out: 0.74 / 0.69 ✓
vs original: 0.73 / 0.70 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.71 / 0.34 ✗
vs original: 0.69 / 0.28 ✗
Eva
dresses
red
control
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.74 / 0.82 ✓
vs original: 0.79 / 0.87 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.79 / 0.85 ✓
vs original: 0.81 / 0.86 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.83 / 0.87 ✓
vs original: 0.74 / 0.83 ✓
Andraz
jeans
navy, blue, orange, red, yellow
control
original: garment alone, already cut out; face 0.01

B, drawn from a clean product photo, invents multicolour patchwork jeans: a pure hallucination, rightly rejected.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.62 / 0.59 ✓
vs original: 0.68 / 0.67 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.02 / 0.02 ✗
vs original: 0.02 / 0.02 ✗
C
vs cut-out: 0.53 / 0.56 ✓
vs original: 0.57 / 0.55 ✓
Ivona
jeans
blue
control
original: garment alone, already cut out; face 0.01

C looks fine but fails against the cut-out (judge).

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.54 / 0.60 ✓
vs original: 0.63 / 0.68 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.63 / 0.61 ✓
vs original: 0.55 / 0.57 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.54 / 0.44 ✗
vs original: 0.55 / 0.50 ✓
Andraz
knitwear
beige
control
original: garment alone, already cut out; face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.75 / 0.88 ✓
vs original: 0.82 / 0.92 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.75 / 0.87 ✓
vs original: 0.65 / 0.83 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.82 / 0.91 ✓
vs original: 0.72 / 0.89 ✓
Eva
knitwear
blue
control
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.68 / 0.83 ✓
vs original: 0.72 / 0.83 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.63 / 0.68 ✓
vs original: 0.69 / 0.69 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.59 / 0.82 ✓
vs original: 0.56 / 0.77 ✓
Ivona
trainers
beige, green, brown, white
control
original: garment alone, already cut out; face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.77 / 0.78 ✓
vs original: 0.74 / 0.77 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.78 / 0.77 ✓
vs original: 0.80 / 0.79 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.79 / 0.77 ✓
vs original: 0.82 / 0.80 ✓
Ivona
trousers
grey
control
original: worn by a person, with other things; face 0.01

Worn photo with a bag over the trousers. All three are plausible; C fails only against the fragment cut-out.

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.51 / 0.54 ✓
vs original: 0.86 / 0.88 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.57 / 0.60 ✓
vs original: 0.87 / 0.88 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.39 / 0.45 ✗
vs original: 0.85 / 0.86 ✓
Eva
trousers
brown, beige
control
original: product shot (plain ground, garment alone); face 0.01

Original
Cut-out
A
vs cut-out: 0.62 / 0.78 ✓
vs original: 0.71 / 0.78 ✓
B
vs cut-out: 0.74 / 0.82 ✓
vs original: 0.78 / 0.82 ✓
C
vs cut-out: 0.72 / 0.77 ✓
vs original: 0.64 / 0.76 ✓